Review of The Wolf of Wall Street Full Movie The Wolf of Wall Street is released on November 15th, 2013 (In American Time). The Wolf of Wall Street is full of Biography, crime & drama film. So Watch The Wolf of Wall Street Online Free Streaming to your PC, Laptop & any kind of wellknown format.
The nike jordan Belfort reigned over Wall Street with an iron fist, back in the 1990s, following he or she started the actual stock broker organization Stratton Oakmont. He or she did start to rake within 1000s of dollars one minute as well as created the hard-partying way of life support through a good limitless availability of medicines, intercourse, as well as worldwide disarray.
Quickly – or even instead, not really subsequently – the government analysis confronted in order to uncover the actual filthy aspect associated with Belfort’s whitened scruff of the neck company, including share mau, stock options scams as well as negotiations using the Mafia. This is actually the tale associated with The Wolf of Wall Street.
Director Martin Scorsese and star Leonardo DiCaprio reunited for The Wolf of Wall Street, that is the actual duo’s 6th effort in the last 10 years (returning in order to Gangs associated with Ny within 2002). The film is based on Belfort’s published memoir and was adapted for the screen by Boardwalk Empire creator Terence Winter, with the helping throw which includes Jonah Hill (This Is the End), Matthew McConaughey (Mud)), Jean Dujardin (The Artist), Kyle Chandler (Zero Dark Thirty), Margot Robbie (Pan Am), Cristin Milioti (How I Met Your Mother), Jon Bernthal (The Walking Dead) and Jon Favreau (Iron Man 3).
Leonardo DiCaprio is one of my favorite actors of all time. So, when I saw The Great Gatsby, I was heavily disappointed. Luckily, Leo righted the ship later in the year with The Wolf of Wall Street. It's arguably the best performance of his career and the film is must-see for that reason alone. DiCaprio is at his best when paired with Martin Scorsese (see Gangs of New York and The Departed) and that rings true again here.
The film is not without issues. At just under three hours, it runs long, especially in the second half. There are a few scenes that could've been cut out or at least cut short. A scene where Leo meets with his aunt by marriage while in Europe particularly overstays its welcome. Other than that, this fires on all cylinders. The writing, directing and acting are all great. Jonah Hill is actually a standout in that department, playing his character with just the right blend of loyalty and sliminess. Jordan Belfort is also portrayed in fascinating fashion. He's a layered character that leaves the viewer in between loving him and hating him.
One thing I didn't expect, was for this to be so damn funny. I knew it ventured into comedy at times, but parts of it had me in stitches. The scene where Belfort takes the drugs with the delayed reaction is hilarious. Watching DiCaprio drag himself into his car and then get into a fight with Hill had to be some of the finest work of either man's careers. Ridiculousness like that is perfectly intertwined with the tale of a man who seemingly had it all, yet was never satisfied and it led to his downfall.
It's hard not to be completely enthralled by this. Leonardo DiCaprio deserved his Oscar win for this and it's another hit for Scorsese. It's one of the best films in recent years, led by great direction, stellar performances and a witty script. The only issue is that it goes a bit long
To preface this review, I'm not someone who really gets offended or "grossed out" to actions depicted on screen. I have yet to cower away from watching even the most tasteless of unrated, obscure, and filthy "John Waters-esq" films. However, for the first ever in a film, I sincerely wanted to walk out of Wolf on Wall Street, very early on in the film. Perhaps to the director's credit, my very reaction (albeit, potentially not that extreme, for obvious reasons) was his goal, ultimately, and maybe he succeeded all to well. To this day, I'm unsure what would have been the better decision - leave, or finish watching, but the choice has been made. My issues with this film are based on a variety of choices made, the tone of the film, the length, and awkward lingering of particular scenes with the intent to "showcase" Leonardo's questionable acting "talent" in this film.
First, for some context: Goodfellas is still my favorite film of all time. I could watch it any day of the week, and feel exhilarated, conflicted, and interested in the plight of the disturbed - yet appealing - cast of characters. Goodfellas is film that enters the controversial life of "ganagster", living hectic "nontraditional" businessmen lives breaking the law, and sometimes killing anyone who gets in the way. Despite all the debauchery and ruthlessness displayed by it's characters, they were all still memorable, oddly relatable, and with their own codes of honor and whacked ethics. Many people in the world could likely see eye-to-eye with many of the characters of the film in certain contexts, despite how extreme and savage some their actions might have been. The film knew how to display these characters at the times when they were appealing, and then equally demonstrate the consequences of both their own tragic faults in their personalities, and the faults of the life of being part of a criminal operation.
Now, Wolf on Wallstreet, on the other hand, completely goes off the rails in it's attempt to portray the mindset of the main character. You see through the eyes of the atrocious man so clearly, it's almost as if he was behind the creation of the whole film itself: almost completely glamorizing nearly every single despicable act one could think of, without any attempt to comment, juxtapose, or use these actions to make a statement. It is almost as if we are watching a raw recreation the main character's life for the sole purpose of watching it completely unedited, as if his rampant drug abuse and sexual acts are something of a historical novelty worth experiencing first hand (For one example, the orgies during the height of the roman catholic papacy have this all beat, so where's THAT film?). The humor is lowest common denominator, and worthlessly low brow. The film never seems to show any sign of acknowledging the atrocities displayed by it's characters and plot: it just plods along, showing everything as typical, wonderful, and entertaining. Even during the very end of the film, when the tone finally starts to change, it is only because the character himself is starting to face severe consequences. In theory, all of this "should" be fine, but a director needs to walk a very careful line between exploring/evaluating a criminal's life style, and just displaying needless sexual acts and drug abuse for 3 hours, in a seemingly endless masturbatory manner.
I suppose I don't understand this film's purpose. Goodfellas could also easily be interpreted as masturbatory in nature with it's depiction of violence and crime, but it is also ripe with scenes that establish context, redeem, evaluate or explain characters, and takes a tone that is observant, yet not completely partial to supporting EVEYTHING the main character does. That film took many risks with a controversial figure, and made it an incredibly enjoyable film... Wolf on Wallstreet is disgusting, annoying, and frustrating. The film isn't enjoyable in it's ability to demonstrate or critique these things about it's main characters - it just shows us them, in their full "glory".
Quickly – or even instead, not really subsequently – the government analysis confronted in order to uncover the actual filthy aspect associated with Belfort’s whitened scruff of the neck company, including share mau, stock options scams as well as negotiations using the Mafia. This is actually the tale associated with The Wolf of Wall Street.
Director Martin Scorsese and star Leonardo DiCaprio reunited for The Wolf of Wall Street, that is the actual duo’s 6th effort in the last 10 years (returning in order to Gangs associated with Ny within 2002). The film is based on Belfort’s published memoir and was adapted for the screen by Boardwalk Empire creator Terence Winter, with the helping throw which includes Jonah Hill (This Is the End), Matthew McConaughey (Mud)), Jean Dujardin (The Artist), Kyle Chandler (Zero Dark Thirty), Margot Robbie (Pan Am), Cristin Milioti (How I Met Your Mother), Jon Bernthal (The Walking Dead) and Jon Favreau (Iron Man 3).
The film is not without issues. At just under three hours, it runs long, especially in the second half. There are a few scenes that could've been cut out or at least cut short. A scene where Leo meets with his aunt by marriage while in Europe particularly overstays its welcome. Other than that, this fires on all cylinders. The writing, directing and acting are all great. Jonah Hill is actually a standout in that department, playing his character with just the right blend of loyalty and sliminess. Jordan Belfort is also portrayed in fascinating fashion. He's a layered character that leaves the viewer in between loving him and hating him.
One thing I didn't expect, was for this to be so damn funny. I knew it ventured into comedy at times, but parts of it had me in stitches. The scene where Belfort takes the drugs with the delayed reaction is hilarious. Watching DiCaprio drag himself into his car and then get into a fight with Hill had to be some of the finest work of either man's careers. Ridiculousness like that is perfectly intertwined with the tale of a man who seemingly had it all, yet was never satisfied and it led to his downfall.
It's hard not to be completely enthralled by this. Leonardo DiCaprio deserved his Oscar win for this and it's another hit for Scorsese. It's one of the best films in recent years, led by great direction, stellar performances and a witty script. The only issue is that it goes a bit long
To preface this review, I'm not someone who really gets offended or "grossed out" to actions depicted on screen. I have yet to cower away from watching even the most tasteless of unrated, obscure, and filthy "John Waters-esq" films. However, for the first ever in a film, I sincerely wanted to walk out of Wolf on Wall Street, very early on in the film. Perhaps to the director's credit, my very reaction (albeit, potentially not that extreme, for obvious reasons) was his goal, ultimately, and maybe he succeeded all to well. To this day, I'm unsure what would have been the better decision - leave, or finish watching, but the choice has been made. My issues with this film are based on a variety of choices made, the tone of the film, the length, and awkward lingering of particular scenes with the intent to "showcase" Leonardo's questionable acting "talent" in this film.
First, for some context: Goodfellas is still my favorite film of all time. I could watch it any day of the week, and feel exhilarated, conflicted, and interested in the plight of the disturbed - yet appealing - cast of characters. Goodfellas is film that enters the controversial life of "ganagster", living hectic "nontraditional" businessmen lives breaking the law, and sometimes killing anyone who gets in the way. Despite all the debauchery and ruthlessness displayed by it's characters, they were all still memorable, oddly relatable, and with their own codes of honor and whacked ethics. Many people in the world could likely see eye-to-eye with many of the characters of the film in certain contexts, despite how extreme and savage some their actions might have been. The film knew how to display these characters at the times when they were appealing, and then equally demonstrate the consequences of both their own tragic faults in their personalities, and the faults of the life of being part of a criminal operation.
Now, Wolf on Wallstreet, on the other hand, completely goes off the rails in it's attempt to portray the mindset of the main character. You see through the eyes of the atrocious man so clearly, it's almost as if he was behind the creation of the whole film itself: almost completely glamorizing nearly every single despicable act one could think of, without any attempt to comment, juxtapose, or use these actions to make a statement. It is almost as if we are watching a raw recreation the main character's life for the sole purpose of watching it completely unedited, as if his rampant drug abuse and sexual acts are something of a historical novelty worth experiencing first hand (For one example, the orgies during the height of the roman catholic papacy have this all beat, so where's THAT film?). The humor is lowest common denominator, and worthlessly low brow. The film never seems to show any sign of acknowledging the atrocities displayed by it's characters and plot: it just plods along, showing everything as typical, wonderful, and entertaining. Even during the very end of the film, when the tone finally starts to change, it is only because the character himself is starting to face severe consequences. In theory, all of this "should" be fine, but a director needs to walk a very careful line between exploring/evaluating a criminal's life style, and just displaying needless sexual acts and drug abuse for 3 hours, in a seemingly endless masturbatory manner.
I suppose I don't understand this film's purpose. Goodfellas could also easily be interpreted as masturbatory in nature with it's depiction of violence and crime, but it is also ripe with scenes that establish context, redeem, evaluate or explain characters, and takes a tone that is observant, yet not completely partial to supporting EVEYTHING the main character does. That film took many risks with a controversial figure, and made it an incredibly enjoyable film... Wolf on Wallstreet is disgusting, annoying, and frustrating. The film isn't enjoyable in it's ability to demonstrate or critique these things about it's main characters - it just shows us them, in their full "glory".
No comments:
Post a Comment